Slate's Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick: The Contraceptive Mandate
March 29, 2016 3:29 PM - Subscribe
This week, SCOTUS heard arguments in Zubik v Burwell, the latest challenge to Obamacare. In it, a group of religious nonprofits are challenging the govt.'s workaround for employers who don't want anything to do with getting birth control to their workers.
This past week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act. In Zubik v. Burwell, a group of religious nonprofits is challenging the government’s accommodation for employers who don’t want to have anything to do with providing birth control to their workers. Dahlia speaks with former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, who argued the case for the plaintiffs, and to former acting U.S. Solicitor General Walter Dellinger, who supports the government’s position.
This week’s excerpts from the Supreme Court’s public sessions were provided by Oyez, a free law project at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, part of the Illinois Institute of Technology.
This past week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act. In Zubik v. Burwell, a group of religious nonprofits is challenging the government’s accommodation for employers who don’t want to have anything to do with providing birth control to their workers. Dahlia speaks with former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, who argued the case for the plaintiffs, and to former acting U.S. Solicitor General Walter Dellinger, who supports the government’s position.
This week’s excerpts from the Supreme Court’s public sessions were provided by Oyez, a free law project at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, part of the Illinois Institute of Technology.
Next Episode »
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
