The Peripheral
January 16, 2017 6:15 AM - by William Gibson - Subscribe

William Gibson's 2014 novel is a noirish scifi thriller that, as usual for Gibson, raises many more questions than it answers. Set in two different-but-related post-apocalyptic worlds, it's something of a return to his early work, but by no means a rehash.

I liked this book so much that I immediately re-read it (unheard of for me). I think it's Gibson's best work since Neuromancer.

It seems clear to me that this book is the beginning of another Gibson series. What I am dying to find out is, is Flynne's world an alternate in a many-worlds universe, or is it a simulation?
posted by ubiquity (7 comments total) 3 users marked this as a favorite
 
I had been meaning to start this but got distracted. Entering cyberspace now.
posted by sammyo at 11:17 AM on January 16


I really enjoyed this! I thought it sagged a bit in the middle, but had so many treats sprinkled throughout for the reader I didn't care. My first Gibson novel - I got into him via his essay collection.
posted by Gin and Broadband at 12:23 PM on January 16


I've always been a fan of Gibson, the really enjoyed The Peripheral. The 'deep premise' is interesting and is open for further exploration.

It's a complicated story that can be enjoyable to unravel and try to figure out what, exactly, is going on. On the other hand, it's written well enough to be enjoyable on the surface.

Some interesting allegory/warning on end-stage capitalism.
posted by porpoise at 1:40 PM on January 16


I wouldn't hold out too much hope for any sequels or for the question of many-worlds versus simulation being answered; from an interview with the author:
Is this the first part of a trilogy?

I don't think so. This is a standalone piece. I think this multiverse material has such inherently appalling genre cheese potential that writing sequels would inevitably involve explaining where and what the server is and who is doing what to whom. That would retroactively cheese out the original volume. We've seen this before with other books – no need to name names. The only reason for those sequels is economic. It's OK – I can afford not to write this sequel. I've already got an idea for something else that's considerably different.
In light of geopolitics since the book's release, I've been thinking that the Jackpot might be too optimistic a take, not that the setting should be taken as predictive.
posted by Strutter Cane - United Planets Stilt Patrol at 8:00 PM on January 16 [2 favorites]


Sigh.
posted by ubiquity at 7:08 AM on January 17


oh I quite enjoyed this book as well! I think it was the first... no the second one I made a book map for, and I'm quite glad I did, because it really helped me enjoy it to remember who the characters are (which is something I struggle with)
posted by rebent at 6:32 PM on January 18


Like too many of Gibson's last few books, the climax after an engrossing, fascinating build, comes too quickly and is over. Unlike most of his books, the reveal of the villain really felt arbitrary and not well motivated. He got a little Stephenson-ish on this one, but did redeem it a bit with his epilogue.

None of this is to say I disliked the book at all (though the inhabitants of the Pacific Gyre seemed oddly only there for shock value) -- I really enjoyed it, and it's a great return-to-SF from his last trilogy, of which only the third felt like it was really firing on all cylinders.

One detail that I honestly think only Bill Gibson could fully sell as deeply weird and totally feasible future details was The Parliament of Birds. Other authors (maybe Mieville, maybe Sterling) would have come up with it but only Mieville would have a chance at really making it work aside from Gibson. As soon as it got to that part, I went all swoony again with the old magic he's so good at digging up.
posted by tclark at 7:51 AM on January 19


« Older The Young Pope: Episode 1...   |  Star Trek: Voyager: Phage... Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments

poster