Brawl in Cell Block 99 (2017)
January 3, 2018 11:40 AM -
A former boxer-turned-drug runner lands in a prison battleground after a deal gets deadly.
(5 comments total)
5 users marked this as a favorite
I thought this movie was great! The violence was completely nuts, as was the plot, and casting.
It seemed like it was written and shot for someone built like Dwayne Johnson, but there's Vince Vaughn standing there. He's a movie tough guy sort of like Lee Marvin and John Wayne were: big, but not freakish or even really ripped. The viewer is basically just asked to accept that he's a force of nature. I feel like this makes a more enjoyable movie somehow.
Also, I guess I just love this kind of movie violence.
on January 3
I also like these sort of elevated genre pieces. Genre with a slightly bigger budget. It was a tad too long though. I think it would have worked better if it was told in a more economical manner.
on January 5
The lack of soundtrack in "exciting" scenes probably made this movie for me. I wish filmmakers had the guts to do that more often. Soundtracks have become so rote that, even though I pay little attention to them in any case (which is my fault), I notice when they aren't there (the point being how rare is that, in terms of how attention works).
Based on comments here I thought this was going to be a bloodbath, such that I might not even be interested, so for prospective viewers I would say it has very violent depictions in the key violent scenes, but it's not filled with violence. If I'm not mistaken, the first violent scene (excluding a standard gun fight) doesn't even occur until 1h10 into the film. (There is implied violence towards the protagonist's wife, who is kidnapped, but none depicted or occurred.)
The rest of the film felt restrained (see soundtrack) and that is largely why I liked it. That man-of-few-words, efficient protagonist trope. No time is spent lamenting his fall or blaming anything for it. I didn't mind the length, as I felt like a lot of characterization and plot gates were moved through in an efficient way--while the movie I watched after this (S King's
on NF) was 20m shorter and I was still "ok, wrap it up"--never happened here.
on January 6 [
The film is also very good at leaving scenes that are so common that they can be left to the imagination—to the imagination. Once the prison guard puts on the rubber glove, the scene is over. There is no "gradually becoming hostile toward a gang in the prison yard"—which in turn might have required a "one prisoner who the protagonist can get friendly with" exposition—just one quick encounter.
I suppose what the film does so well is tease the protagonist's violence, numerous times, in
the right amount. How can a film feel so efficient while including scenes that are "teases"? It's an accomplishment.
on January 6
If I'm not mistaken, the first violent scene (excluding a standard gun fight) doesn't even occur until 1h10 into the film.
He fucked up that car pretty good tho in the first reel.
But also this is a seriously violent film. Even more so than
, which had just one scene that sent people running for the door. Yes, the violence only hits in a few key moments, but JESUS CHRIST does it hit. I know what you mean by "restrained," though -- I suspect the real bone-cracking element here is the sound mix, which is brutal!
I love this film. I liked
a lot but this is even more magnificent. It's no
but it's definitely one of the movies of the year for me. I wish the director weren't hooking up with Mel Gibson for his next picture, but I guess I'll just have to see what he does with that.
on January 8
McMafia: Episode Two... | The X-Files: My Struggle III...
You are not logged in, either
create an account
to post comments
I wrote this