Naked Lunch (1991)
March 27, 2017 10:10 PM - Subscribe
After developing an addiction to the substance he uses to kill bugs, writer and exterminator Bill Lee (Peter Weller) accidentally murders his wife (Judy Davis) and becomes involved in a secret government plot in the Interzone, a port town in North Africa. Or, perhaps, he’s wandering the streets in a drugged haze. Or both. Per the MPAA, “Rated R for heavy drug content, bizarre eroticism, and language”
even if it isn’t a straightforward kind of pleasure
I guess I feel something similar towards the film; it's sometimes difficult to watch but it does creep under your skin and demands a response. Perhaps not even an intellectual, but a physical one. It's much easier to feel than to think watching Naked Lunch; and by easier I of course mean more uncomfortable. It is a very corporeal film, making me, at least, feel like the man with a talking asshole, in that thought and digestion is no longer separable. So, yes, an uncomfortable pleasure; a jouissance perhaps, to use Barthes's term.
posted by sapagan at 10:53 PM on March 27, 2017
I guess I feel something similar towards the film; it's sometimes difficult to watch but it does creep under your skin and demands a response. Perhaps not even an intellectual, but a physical one. It's much easier to feel than to think watching Naked Lunch; and by easier I of course mean more uncomfortable. It is a very corporeal film, making me, at least, feel like the man with a talking asshole, in that thought and digestion is no longer separable. So, yes, an uncomfortable pleasure; a jouissance perhaps, to use Barthes's term.
posted by sapagan at 10:53 PM on March 27, 2017
Naked Lunch and Barton Fink came out in the same year, and forever typecast Judy Davis in my mind as a player of a writer's wife or muse fatale or whatever.
posted by fleacircus at 1:12 AM on March 28, 2017 [3 favorites]
posted by fleacircus at 1:12 AM on March 28, 2017 [3 favorites]
Naked Lunch - a frozen moment when everyone sees whats on the end of every fork.
I feel like the US is having one of those atm.
posted by Sebmojo at 2:51 PM on March 28, 2017
I feel like the US is having one of those atm.
posted by Sebmojo at 2:51 PM on March 28, 2017
The Siskel & Ebert discussion kind of captures the vibe.
posted by Going To Maine at 3:06 PM on March 28, 2017
posted by Going To Maine at 3:06 PM on March 28, 2017
The novel is highly evocative, but almost the essence of unfilmable (if he didn't go on to write the cut-up trilogy). Cronenberg is the best possible director—who else could, Jodorowsky?
posted by snofoam at 8:40 PM on March 28, 2017
posted by snofoam at 8:40 PM on March 28, 2017
I also thought the book was unfilmable, but Cronenberg did a hell of a job nailing the ambiance and getting some of the freakishness to come through while still managing a film that mostly manages a narrative structure.
posted by rmd1023 at 4:04 PM on March 29, 2017 [1 favorite]
posted by rmd1023 at 4:04 PM on March 29, 2017 [1 favorite]
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
By now, I’ve come to think of that kind of nagging as a sign that I really like something, even if it isn’t a straightforward kind of pleasure. Cronenberg really did something here, a compelling adaptation of a book that I generally found impenetrable, gross, and unenjoyable.
posted by Going To Maine at 10:18 PM on March 27, 2017 [2 favorites]